WOT for Chrome: Is It Still Safe in 2025?Web of Trust (WOT) was one of the earliest and most widely recognized browser extensions that promised to help users judge website trustworthiness quickly. It displayed color-coded ratings next to search results and site addresses, and relied on a combination of community ratings and aggregated data sources to assign reputations. As of 2025, the question many users ask is: can you still rely on WOT for Chrome, or should you look for alternatives? This article examines WOT’s history, ownership and privacy record, how it works now, its security and privacy implications in 2025, recommended use cases, and safer alternatives.
Brief history and notable controversies
WOT launched in 2007 and quickly gained popularity for providing simple visual cues about website safety. However, the extension’s reputation suffered due to controversies:
- In 2016–2017 WOT faced scrutiny and media reports claiming it sold detailed browsing data about users to third parties. Investigations suggested that data collected by the extension — including full URLs visited — had been shared with data brokers, raising privacy and ethical concerns.
- In response, WOT’s parent company changed business practices, clarified its privacy policy, and later ownership/management shifted. Despite public statements, past incidents left many users wary.
The important takeaway: WOT’s past includes real privacy concerns, and those incidents shaped how privacy-conscious users view the extension.
Who owns WOT today (as of 2025)?
Ownership and corporate structure matter for privacy and trust. Over the years WOT has changed hands and rebranded various components. By 2025, it remains associated with entities that operate the WOT services and browser extensions; however, exact ownership details can change and should be checked on the official WOT site and the Chrome Web Store listing before installing. Ownership changes can affect data handling policies, so they’re relevant when deciding whether to use the extension.
How WOT works now
WOT’s core functionality hasn’t dramatically changed: it aggregates ratings from:
- Community user ratings and comments
- Automated signals from malware/phishing blocklists and other reputation sources
- In some versions, third-party feeds and telemetry
The extension displays scores and color-coded icons (green/yellow/red) for sites, and often shows detailed reputation pages explaining why a rating was assigned (user reviews, domain history, etc.).
However, specifics of data collection and telemetry—what is sent back to WOT’s servers, whether full URLs are logged, and how long data is retained—depend on the current privacy policy and extension permissions. Always check the latest privacy policy and the permissions requested by the Chrome extension.
Security and privacy assessment (2025)
Consider these factors when evaluating safety:
- Permissions: WOT typically requests broad permissions to read and change website data. In Chrome, this commonly appears as “Read and change all your data on the websites you visit.” That permission is necessary for real-time reputation checks but also allows the extension to view page content and URLs.
- Risk: Broad access increases privacy exposure if the extension or its backend mishandles data or is compromised.
- Data collection practices: Past incidents involved sharing browsing data. WOT’s current policy may limit or anonymize collected data, but anonymization is imperfect—unique URL paths can re-identify users or reveal sensitive activity.
- Risk: Even “anonymous” telemetry can be deanonymized; avoid extensions that log full URLs if you need strong privacy.
- Business model: If a service monetizes by selling aggregated browsing data to advertisers or data brokers, that’s a privacy red flag. Check whether WOT derives revenue from data sharing or from subscription/enterprise services instead.
- Track record: No matter updates to policy, prior trust breaches matter. Companies with a history of questionable data practices require ongoing scrutiny.
Overall judgment for 2025: WOT can be convenient, but it carries privacy trade-offs. Whether it’s “safe” depends on your threat model: for casual use on non-sensitive browsing it may be acceptable; for privacy-conscious users or those who browse sensitive sites (health, finance, legal), it’s riskier.
Practical recommendations before installing WOT for Chrome
- Read the Chrome Web Store permissions carefully. If it asks to “Read and change all your data on the websites you visit,” treat that as high-risk access.
- Review WOT’s current privacy policy and data retention/processing statements. Look specifically for:
- Whether full URLs are logged or only domain-level data
- Whether data is sold/shared with third parties
- Retention periods and deletion procedures
- Check the developer/publisher name and website from the Chrome Web Store. Verify whether ownership changed recently and if that entity has a reputable history.
- Inspect extension updates and changelogs; sudden additions of telemetry or new permissions are red flags.
- Consider the extension’s review history and recent user reports for suspicious behavior.
Safer ways to get similar protection
If you want website reputation and safety signals but minimize privacy risks, consider these alternatives or mitigations:
- Use built-in browser features: Chrome and other browsers include phishing/malware protection (Google Safe Browsing) without third-party extensions.
- Rely on DNS-level protection: Services like Cloudflare Gateway, NextDNS, or OpenDNS can block known malicious domains at the DNS layer without exposing full browsing details to a browser extension.
- Use privacy-respecting reputation services: Some extensions explicitly state they only use domain-level checks or operate locally; prefer those with open-source code and transparent policies.
- Combine selective extension use with compartmentalization: Use a separate browser profile or a dedicated browser for sensitive browsing with fewer or no extensions installed.
- Consider standalone security tools: Antivirus and endpoint protection solutions often have safe-browsing modules that don’t require a browser extension to monitor URLs.
Use cases where WOT might be acceptable
- Non-sensitive browsing where convenience matters (quick visual cues on unknown sites).
- Users who value community-based reputation signals and are comfortable with the extension’s current privacy commitments.
- Environments where central enterprise controls and monitoring already exist and users accept additional telemetry.
Use cases where WOT is not recommended
- Browsing sensitive sites (medical, legal, financial) where URL-level data could reveal private information.
- Users who require strong anonymity or protection from data brokers.
- Situations where extension permissions cannot be justified (e.g., organization security policy forbids broad “read and change” permissions).
Alternatives comparison
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| WOT (extension) | Community ratings, visual cues, familiar UI | Broad permissions, past privacy controversies |
| Browser built-in (Safe Browsing) | No third-party extension, maintained by browser vendor | Centralized to vendor (e.g., Google), may not show community comments |
| DNS filtering (NextDNS, Cloudflare) | Blocks malicious domains at network level, less granular data sharing | Requires config; may need paid features for full customization |
| Open-source/local extensions | Transparent code, often domain-only checks | Smaller communities, may be less feature-rich |
| Antivirus/endpoint tools | Integrated protection, enterprise options | May be resource-heavy, vendor trust required |
Final verdict
- Short answer: WOT for Chrome can still be used in 2025, but it is not risk-free.
- For casual, non-sensitive browsing the convenience may outweigh the privacy trade-offs if you verify the current privacy policy and permissions.
- For privacy-conscious users or sensitive browsing, prefer alternatives (browser built-ins, DNS filtering, or open-source extensions) that minimize URL-level data collection.
Quick checklist before you install
- Check extension permissions in Chrome.
- Read the current privacy policy (search “WOT privacy policy” on the publisher page).
- Confirm who owns/publishes the extension and recent changelog entries.
- Decide if you can accept the risk of an extension that can read every page you visit.
If you want, I can:
- Check WOT’s current Chrome Web Store listing and privacy policy for you and summarize any risky permissions or recent ownership changes.
Leave a Reply